快三大发_ -（中国）互动百科

来源：快三大发2021-04-28 17:48

快三大发

贵州开行“冰雪主题”列车南方游客畅享冰雪乐趣******

　　(新春见闻)贵州开行“冰雪主题”列车南方游客畅享冰雪乐趣

　　中新社贵阳1月7日电 (记者张伟)2023年中国春运首日，贵州2023年首列“冰雪主题”列车C6031次“复兴号”于9时31分由贵阳北站驶出，载着607名旅客前往六盘水。值乘列车长李小林告诉记者：“适逢周末，车上有近三分之一的旅客是奔赴贵州六盘水的三大滑雪场滑雪。”

　　曾几何时，中国冰雪运动“不过山海关”。近年来，贵州省六盘水市相继建成玉舍、乌蒙、梅花山3个天然滑雪场，在这里，贵州人不出省、南方人不远足，就能享受到冰雪运动的乐趣。

　　“贵州境内的8个滑雪景点，其中安六高铁(安顺至六盘水)沿线就有5个。”李小林对记者说，如今坐着高铁去滑雪正成为中国西南地区民众的新时尚。

　　“冰雪主题”列车车厢内，蓝、白色调装饰为主，顶棚及车窗等部位贴有白色“雪花片”，车厢内兔年元素的装饰品、滑雪设备存放处标识、乘务员冰雪元素的胸牌、丝巾以及“乘坐高铁去滑雪”的海报，令人耳目一新。

　　“冰雪主题”列车上，乘务员指引旅客存放专属滑雪设备。贵阳铁路疾控中心医务人员王婕细致地介绍了冰雪运动前要注意的健康防护及健康安全提示。各大滑雪景区的推介资料、滑雪安全注意事项的宣传折页吸引了部分旅客取阅。餐吧车备好的红糖姜茶、手套及围巾供有需求的滑雪旅客免费拿取，这些服务举措都颇受旅客好评。

　　酷爱滑雪运动的乘务员刘敏为旅客示范、讲解滑雪服的穿戴要领，还归纳了自己在滑雪过程中常出现的小状况及应对技巧。几名“零基础”的旅客争相尝试体验滑雪服穿戴，不时问刘敏一些滑雪知识。“有人教我们要领，还讲解滑雪安全注意事项，令我内心的紧张和不安减轻了不少。”旅客龙瑞芳开心地说。

　　在贵州实施的“一免三减半”(景区门票免费，自驾车过路费、住宿费、购买商品费五折)的“冬游贵州”钜惠等活动政策的加持下，冰雪“冷资源”正逐步变成贵州旅游的“热动力”。

　　2023年春运，中国铁路成都局集团公司贵阳客运段打造“高铁+冰雪旅游”新产品，设计开行多趟“安六冰雪游”主题列车，方便旅客出行的同时，通过高铁这一流动载体，吸引更多民众参与冰雪运动。(完)

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.